Chronic Humidity and Nasal Mucosal Dysfunction in Tropical Climates: Implications for Sinonasal Health in Sub-Saharan Africa and the Developing World — A Systematic Review

Authors

  • Shuaib Aremu Department of Ear Nose and Throat, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Afe Babalola University, Ado-Ekiti. Ekiti State, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54548/

Abstract

 The nasal mucosa is the primary defense mechanism of the upper respiratory tract. Its functionality relies heavily on the intricate balance of mucociliary clearance (MCC), mucosal hydration, epithelial tight junction integrity, and local immunological responses. While the detrimental physiological effects of low humidity and cold temperatures on nasal function are extensively documented in the literature, the physiological and pathological impacts of chronic exposure to high relative humidity (RH) and high temperatures—the defining characteristics of tropical and equatorial climates—remain significantly underrepresented and poorly synthesised. Given that approximately 40% of the global population lives in these climate zones, understanding these mechanisms is of paramount importance to global health. This evidence gap is particularly critical for sub-Saharan Africa, where sinonasal disorders constitute a significant and underappreciated component of the otolaryngological disease burden, yet region-specific clinical guidelines remain largely absent. Compounding this, rapid urbanisation across African and Asian tropical cities is accelerating the adoption of air-conditioning, creating novel patterns of indoor–outdoor micro-climatic exposure that may be fundamentally altering the epidemiology of chronic rhinitis. This systematic review aims to comprehensively evaluate the correlation between high ambient humidity in tropical climates and nasal mucosal function. The primary endpoints include mucociliary clearance times, ciliary beat frequency (CBF), mucus rheology (viscoelasticity), epithelial barrier integrity, and the epidemiological prevalence of specific sinonasal disorders such as tropical allergic rhinitis and non-allergic vasomotor rhinitis. A rigorous systematic literature search was conducted in strict adherence to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The search spanned PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for peer-reviewed articles published between January 1, 2000, and January 1, 2025. Inclusion criteria mandated studies evaluating human nasal mucosal physiology, MCC time, CBF, and humidity levels exceeding 70%. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomised trials. Out of 1,420 initially identified records, 45 studies met the stringent inclusion criteria for qualitative synthesis. The aggregated data indicate a complex, non-linear, U-shaped relationship between ambient RH and MCC efficiency: optimal MCC occurs between 40% and 60% RH, while chronic exposure to tropical humidity (>70% RH) combined with high ambient temperatures (>28°C) is associated with mucosal engorgement, altered mucus rheology characterised by decreased viscosity and elasticity, and a paradoxical slowing of ciliary beat frequency (CBF). Furthermore, the modern tropical lifestyle involves frequent, abrupt transitions between highly humid outdoor environments and cold, desiccating air-conditioned indoor spaces. This 'micro-climatic shock' may contribute to reactive turbinate hypertrophy, disrupted osmotic gradients, and increased susceptibility to perennial aeroallergens such as house dust mites and fungal spores. High ambient humidity in tropical climates is associated with altered nasal mucosal function, including impaired MCC and changes in mucus rheology. These findings highlight the need for climate-specific approaches to the management of sinonasal disorders.

Keywords: Nasal mucosa; humidity; tropical climate; mucociliary clearance; rhinitis; air-conditioning

 

 

References

Bousquet J, Van Cauwenberge P and Khaltaev N (2001). Allergic rhinitis and its impact on asthma. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 108(5 Suppl), pp. S147–S334.

Chew FT, Goh DYT and Wang DY (2008). Allergic rhinitis in tropical Asia: an unmet clinical need. Clinical and Experimental Allergy, 38(8), pp. 1205–1208.

Chen X and Wang Y (2021). Rheological characterisation of respiratory mucus under high-humidity conditions. Journal of Biomechanics, 118, p. 110293.

Eccles R (2000). Nasal airway resistance and the nasal cycle. Rhinology, 38(2), pp. 50–53.

Eccles R (2002). An explanation for the seasonality of acute upper respiratory tract viral infections. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 122(2), pp. 183–191.

Fernandez J and Martinez R (2020). Nasal polyposis and mucosal remodelling in tropical populations: a multi-centre cohort study. International Archives of Allergy and Immunology, 181(6), pp. 412–421.

Fokkens WJ, Lund VJ, Mullol J et al. (2012). European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps 2012. Rhinology, 50(Suppl 23), pp. 1–298.

Keck T, Leiacker R, Riechelmann H and Rettinger G (2000). Temperature profile in the nasal cavity. Laryngoscope, 110(4), pp. 651–654.

Munkholm M and Mortensen J (2014). Mucociliary clearance: pathophysiological aspects and clinical measurement techniques. Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging, 34(3), pp. 171–177.

Naclerio RM, Bachert C and Baraniuk JN (2010). Pathophysiology of nasal congestion. International Journal of General Medicine, 3, pp. 47–57.

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, p. n71.

Passali D, Bellussi L, Bianchini Ciampoli M and De Seta E (1985). Experiences in the determination of nasal mucociliary transport time. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 99(5–6), pp. 434–437.

Pawankar R, Canonica GW, Holgate ST and Lockey RF (2011). WAO White Book on Allergy. World Allergy Organisation, Milwaukee, WI.

Proctor DF (1982). The mucociliary system. American Review of Respiratory Disease, 125(2), pp. 97–102.

Salah B, Dinh Xuan AT, Fouilladieu JL, Lockhart A and Regnard J (1988). Nasal mucociliary transport in healthy subjects is slower when breathing dry air. European Respiratory Journal, 1(9), pp. 852–855.

Shaaban R, Zureik M, Soussan D et al. (2008). Rhinitis and onset of asthma: a longitudinal population-based study. Lancet, 372(9643), pp. 1049–1057.

Togias A (2000). Rhinitis and asthma: evidence for respiratory tract disease. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 106(3), pp. 395–399.

Van Cauwenberge P, Bachert C, Passalacqua G et al. (2000). Consensus statement on the treatment of allergic rhinitis. Allergy, 55(2), pp. 116–134.

Watelet JB, Van Zele T and Gevaert P (2006). Wound healing of the nasal and paranasal mucosa: a review. American Journal of Rhinology, 20(2), pp. 209–217.

Wong IY and Lim CM (2025). Turbinate hypertrophy and allergic rhinitis in equatorial Singapore: longitudinal outcomes. Asian Pacific Journal of Allergy and Immunology, [in press].

Zhao K, Jiang J, Blacker K and Rosen D (2014). Regional peak mucosal cooling in the human nasal cavity. Rhinology, 52(4), pp. 344–351.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

Issue

Section

Review Articles

How to Cite

Chronic Humidity and Nasal Mucosal Dysfunction in Tropical Climates: Implications for Sinonasal Health in Sub-Saharan Africa and the Developing World — A Systematic Review. (2026). Nigerian Journal of Physiological Sciences, 41(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.54548/