Morphological and morphometrical studies on the tongue of the juvenile cattle egret (Bulbucus ibis)
Click to view file (PDF)

How to Cite

Olopade, J. O. ., Azeez, I., Omirinde, J., Elisha, J., & Plang, N. (2023). Morphological and morphometrical studies on the tongue of the juvenile cattle egret (Bulbucus ibis). Nigerian Journal of Physiological Sciences, 38(2), 249–258. Retrieved from https://ojshostng.com/index.php/njphysiologicalsciences/article/view/2554

Abstract

Cattle egret (Bubulcus ibis) is a cosmopolitan heron species, with least concern conservation status. There are limited literatures on the anatomy of this bird, especially in relation to its sensory organs, hence we here investigated the gross morphological and histomorphometric features of its tongue. The tongues of twelve healthy juvenile cattle egrets were examined in situ for morphological appearance and gross morphometric measurements were determined ex situ. Routine histology was conducted on the tongue tissue with parameters such as epithelial and lamina propia heights, lingual muscle and entoglossal cartilage heights evaluated. Grossly, the tongue was divided into three parts name; apex, body and the root. It was arrow shaped, conforming to the shape of the beak, with a laryngeal mound bounded caudally by the pharyngeal papillae at its root. A massive entoglossal cartilage formed the core of the cranial apex, ventral body portion, and caudal aspect of the root. Histologically, the lingual mucosa possessed keratinized squamous epithelium in all its divisions, with spinous conical papillae being characteristic of the cranial apical mucosa. The body lingual mucosa possessed foliate papillae on the dorsal aspects, while filiform papillae were prominent in the ventral portions. The lingual root uniquely possessed numerous glandular ducts in its lamina propia as well as localized adipocytes. Overall, the regression analysis data showed that the body weight can be conveniently predicted from tongue parameters. This study has thus provided additional knowledge on the anatomy of the birds and the generated data could prove useful in comparative regional anatomy.

Click to view file (PDF)

References

Abayomi, T. A., Ofusori, D. A., Ayoka, O. A., Odukoya, S. A., Omotoso, E. O., Amegor, F. O., Ajayi, S. A., Ojo, G. B. and Oluwayinka, O. P. (2009): A comparative histological study of the tongue of rat (Rattus Norvegicus), bat (Eidolon Helvum) and pangolin (Manis Tricuspis). Int. J. Morphol. 27, 1111–1119.

Ahmed, S. (2018). Histological and Histomorphometric Evaluation of Anterior Part of Rats Tongue Exposed to Passive Cigarette Smoking. Egypt J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 9:174-178 https://doi.org/10.21608/omx.2019.5326.1018

Al-Zahaby, A-AS. (2016). Light and scanning electron microscopic features of the tongue in cattle egret. Microsc Res Tech 79:595–603. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.22672

Crole, M.R and Soley, J.T (2009). Morphology of the tongue of the Emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae). Gross anatomical features and topography. Ondersteport Journal of Veterinary Research 76: Pp 335-345.

Dyce, K. M., W. O. Sack, and C. J. G. Wensing. (2016). Textbook of Veterinary Anatomy. 5th edn. Philadelphia: Saunders Company. ISBN: 9780323442640.

Ekeolu, O.K., Usende, I.L., Adejumobi, O.A., Azeez, I.A. and Orolu-Adedeji, M.O. (2016). Comparative morphometric study of the right and left pectoral and pelvic bones of cattle egret (Bulbucus ibis). Int J Vet Sci 5:285–289

Erdogan, S., and Iwasaki, S. (2014). Function-related morphological characteristics and specialized structures of the avian tongue. Annals of Anatomy 196(2-3): 75-87.

Erdogan, S. and Alan A. (2012). Gross anatomical and scanning electron microscopic studies of the oropharyngeal cavity in the European Magpie (Pica pica) and the Common raven (Corvus corax). Microscopy Research and Techniques 75: 379-387.

Hancock, J. (1984). Field Identification of West Palearctic White Herons and Egret. Brit Birds, 77: 451-457.

Harrison, J.G. (1964). Tongue. A new dictionary of birds. A.L Thomson, Nelson. Pp. 825-827.

Homberger, D. G. and Meyers, R.A. (1989). Morphology of the lingual apparatus of the domestic chicken (Gallus gallus) with special attention to the structure of the fasciae. American Journal of Anatomy 186: Pp 217-257.

Igado, O.O., Omobowale, T.O., Ajadi, R.A., and Nottidge, H.O. (2015). Gross Morphometric Studies on the Tongue, Buccal Cavity and Hard Palate of the Fruit Bat (Eidolon helvum). J Vet Med Ser C Anat Histol Embryol 44:283–287. https://doi.org/10.1111/ahe.12138

Igwebuike, U.M., and Anagor, T.A. (2013). Morphology of the oropharynx and tongue of the Muscovy duck (Anas platyrhynchos) Veterinary Archives 83:685-693.

Iwasaki, S.I. (2002). Evolution of the structure and function of the vertebrate tongue. J. Anat. 201:1-13

Iwasaki, S., Asami, T., and Chiba, A. (1997). Ultrastructural study of the keratinization of the dorsal epithelium of the tongue of Middendorf’s bean goose, Anser fabalis middendorfii (Anseres, Antidae). Anatomical Record 247: 147-163.

Kobayashi, K., Kumakura, M., Yoshimura, K, Inatomi, M., and Asami, T. (1998). Fine structure of the tongue and lingual papillae of penguin. Archves of Histology and Cytology 61: 37-46.

Lierz, M., and Korbel, R. (2012). Anesthesia and Analgesia in Birds. J Exot Pet Med. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jepm.2011.11.008

Majekodunmi, A.O., Fajinmi, A., Dongkum, C., Shaw, A.P.M. and Welburn, S.C. (2014). Pastoral livelihoods of the Fulani on the Jos Plateau of Nigeria. Pastoralism 2014 4:1. 4 (1), 1–16.

Mckilligan, N. (2005). Herons , Egrets and Bitterns: Their Biology and Conservation Status in Australia. Csiro Publishing, Collingwood, Australia. ISBN: 9780643092099.

McLelland, J. (1979). Digestive system, in form and function in birds. Volume 1, edited by A.S King and J Mclelland. San Diego, California Academic Press. Pp. 69-92.

McLelland, J. (1990). A colour atlas of avian anatomy. Published by Mosby. Pp. 1-127. ISBN 9780723415756.

Nomina Anatomica Avium (2017). Handbook of Avian Anatomy.

Parchami, A. and Dehkordi, R.A. (2011). Lingual structure in the domestic pigeon (Columba livia domestica). A light and scanning microscopic study. World Applied Sciences Journal. 12(9): 1517-22.

Pasand A., Tadjalli M., and Mansouri H. (2010). Microscopic study on the tongue of male ostrich. Eur. J. Bio, Sci. 2(2): 24-31.

Rezk, H.M. (2015a). Anatomical investigation on the appendicular skeleton of the cattle egret (Bubulcus ibis). J Exp Clin Anat 14:5–12.

Rezk, H.M. (2015b). Anatomical Investigation on the Axial Skeleton of the Cattle Egret, Bubulcus Ibis. Assiut Vet. Med. J. 61:12-21

Sabry, D. (2015). Comparative studies on tongue of Egretta ibis and Gallus gallus. Res Opin Anim Vet Sci 5:375-382.

Sasan, J.S., Sarma, K., Suri, S., and Nabi, N. (2019). Gross and morphometrical studies on humerus of cattle egret (Bubulcus ibis). Explor Anim Med Res. 9(1):93-96.

Seedikkoya, K, Azeez, P.A., Abdul Shukkur, E.A. (2007). Cattle egret as a biocontrol agent. Zoos’ Print J. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.zpj.1731.2864-6

Siegfried, W.R. (1971). The Food of the Cattle Egret. J Appl Ecol. 8:447–468. https://doi.org/10.2307/2402882

Skieresz-szewczyk, K., Jackowiak H., and Ratajckzak, M. (2014). LM and TEM study of the orthokeratinized and parakeratinized epithelium of the tongue in the domestic duck (Anas platyrhynchos f. domestica). Micron 67: 117-124.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2023 Nigerian Journal of Physiological Sciences