Ultrasound prevalence and characteristics of incidental thyroid lesions in Nigerian adults.

Resum

Aim/Objective: Thyroid lesions are common and range from the incidental, asymptomatic, small solitary nodule to the large and partly intrathoracic masses. Thyroid lesions that are not palpable but identified by radiological imaging for unrelated symptoms are defined as incidentalomas of the thyroid gland.

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the ultrasound prevalence of thyroid incidentalomas and describe the ultrasound characteristics of such detected incidentalomas in Nigerian adults.

Methods: This was a prospective study that examined 340 subjects over a period of 6 months. They were selected randomly from volunteers and patients presenting for ultrasound examination of other parts of the body. The subjects had their necks examined by palpation and ultrasound in the department of Radiology, University College Hospital, Ibadan, using a General Electric LogicP5 ultrasound machine with a 6-10MHz linear transducer. Any incidentaloma detected was classified using the ‘Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System’ (TIRADS) classification.

Results: Three hundred and forty (340) subjects comprising of 153 males and 187 females were examined. The ultrasound prevalence of thyroid incidentalomas was 22.4%. Thyroid incidentalomas were more common in females than males but this was not statistically significant. The prevalence of thyroid incidentaloma significantly increased with age up to the seventh decade. Majority of the lesions were solitary, homogenous and cystic.

Conclusion: The ultrasound prevalence of thyroid incidentalomas documented in the study area is high (22.4%) and they were commoner in women and older subjects. Majority of the lesions, 41 (53.95%) were classified as TIRADS 2 (benign lesions).

Keywords: ultrasound, thyroid, incidentalomas, TIRADS

Résumé
Introduction: Leslésions de la thyroïde sont fréquentes et la portée de l’accessoire asymptomatique, petit nodule solitaire et varie de grande partie, aux masses intra-thoracique. Les lésions de la thyroïde qui ne sont pas palpables mais identifiées par l’imagerie radiologique pour les symptômes non-liés sont définis comme incidentalomes de la glande thyroïde.

Objectif: L’objectif de cette étude était de déterminer la fréquence de l’échographie de la thyroïde incidentalomes et de décrire les caractéristiques de l’échographie de ces incidentalomes détectés chez les adultes nigérians.

Méthodes: Il s’agissait d’une étude prospective qui a examiné 340 patients sur une période de 6 mois. Ils ont été choisis au hasard  les bénévoles et qui se sont présentés pour un examen échographique d’autres parties du corps. Les patients avaient leurs cous examinés par palpation et échographie dans le département de radiologie au CHU Ibadan, en utilisant le LogicP5 électrique pour l’échographie général avec un transducteur linéaire 6-10MHz. Toute les incidentalomes détectés ont été classés à l’aide de la classification ‘Imaging Reporting thyroïde et Data System ‘(TIRADS).

Résultats: Trois cent quarante (340) patients de sexe confondu (153 hommes et 187 femmes ont été examinés. La fréquence de l’échographie de la thyroïde incidentalomes était de 22,4%. Les incidentalomes de la thyroïde étaient plus fréquents chez les femmes que chez les hommes, mais ce n’était pas statistiquement important. La fréquence des incidentalomes de la thyroïde augmente de façon sensilbement avec l’âge jusqu’à la septième décennie. La majorité des lésions étaient solitaires, homogènes et kystiques.

Conclusion: La fréquence de l’échographie de la thyroïde incidentalomes enrégistrée dans la zone d’étude est élevée (22,4%) et ils étaient plus fréquents chez les femmes et chez les patients âgés. La majorité des lésions, 41 (53,95%) ont été classées comme TIRADS 2 (lésions bénignes).

Correspondence: Dr. Atinuke M. Agunloye, Department of Radiology, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria. E-mail: tinuagunloye@yahoo.com; tinuagunloye@comui.edu.ng

pdf (anglès)

Referències

Vander JB, Gaston EA and Dawber TR. The significance of non-toxic thyroid nodules. Ann Intern Med 1968; 69: 537-540.

Singer PA, Cooper DS and Daniels GH. Treatment guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and well differentiated thyroid cancer. Arch Intern Med 1996; 156: 2165-2172.

Brander A, Vikinnksoki P, Nickels J and Kirisaari L. Thyroid gland: US Screening in a Random Adult Population. Radiology 1991; 181: 683-687.

Mortensen JD, Woolner LB and Bennet WA. Gross and microscopic findings in clinically normal thyroid gland. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1955; 15:1270-1280.

Choi JY, Lee KS, Kim HJ et al. Focal thyroid lesions incidentally identified by integrated 18F-FDG PET/CT: Clinical significance and improved characterization. J Nucl Med 2006; 47:609-615.

Mitchell J and Parangis. The Thyroid Incidentaloma: an increasingly frequent consequence of radiologic imaging. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2005; 26: 37-46.

Bae JS, Chae BJ, Park WC et al. Incidental thyroid lesions detected by FDG-PET/CT: Prevalence and risk of thyroid cancer. World Journal of Surgical Oncology 2009; 7:63.

Scott RS, Mathew JM, Phillip SM, Kenneth SA and Charles AA. The significance of incidental thyroid abnormalities identified during carotid duplex ultrasonography. Arch Surg.2005; 140: 981-985.

Youserm DM, Huang T, Loevner T and Langlotz CT. Clinical and Economic Impact of Incidental Thyroid Lesions found with CT and MR. Am J Neuroradiol 1997; 18: 1423-1428.

Hegedus L. Clinical practice: The Thyroid Nodule. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 1764-1771.

Horvarth E, Majlis S, Rossi R, et al. An Ultrasonogram reporting system for Thyroid nodules stratifying cancer risk for clinical management. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009: 94(5): 1748-1751.

Woestyn J, Afschrift M, Schelstraetek K and Vermuele A. Demonstration of nodules in the normal thyroid by echography. Br J Radiology 1985; 58: 1179-1182.

Horlocker TT, Hay JE, James EM, Reading CC and Charboneau JW. Prevalence of incidental nodular thyroid disease detected during high resolution parathyroid ultrasonography. In: Mediros-Neto G, Gaitan E, Eds. Frontiers in thyroidology. Ninth International Thyroid Congress, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 1985. New York Plenum, 1985; 1309-1312.

Stark DD, Clark OH, Gooding GA and Moss AA. High resolution ultrasonography and computed tomography of thyroid lesions in patients with hyperparathyroidism. Surgery 1983; 94: 863-868..

Kang HW, No JH, Chung JH et al. Prevalence, clinical and ultrasonographic characteristics of thyroid incidentalomas. Thyroid 2004; 14: 29-33.

Mohammadi A, Amirazodi E, Masudi S and Pedram D. Ultrasonographic Prevalence of Thyroid Incidentaloma in Bushehr, Southern Iran. Iran J Radiol 2009; 6 (2): 65-68.

Ahidjo A, Tahir A and Tukur MA. Ultrasound determination of thyroid gland volume among adult Nigerians. The Internet Journal of Radiology 2006;4 :2

Langer P. Discussion about the limit between normal thyroid and goiter: Minireview. Endocrine Regulations 1999; 33:39-45

Hegedus L. Thyroid size determined by ultrasound. Danish Med Bull. 1990; 37: 249-263.

Brander A, Viikinkoski P, Tuuhea J, et al. Clinical versus ultrasound examination of the thyroid gland in common clinical practice. J Clin Ultrasound. 1992; 20:37-42.

Tan GH, Gharib H and Reading CC. Solitary thyroid nodule. Comparison between palpation and ultrasonography. Arch Intern Med. 1995; 155:2418-2423.

Kim EK, Park CS, Chung WY et al. New sonographic criteria for recommending fine-needle aspiration biopsy of non-palpable solid nodules of the thyroid. Am J Roentgenol 2002; 178:687- 691.

Koike E, Noguchi S, Yamashita H et al. Ultrasonographic characteristics of thyroid nodules: prediction of malignancy. Arch Surg 2001; 136:334-337.

Lannuccilli JD, Cronan JJ and Monchik JM. Risk for malignancy of thyroid nodules as assessed by sonographic criteria. J ultrasound Med 2004; 23: 1455-1464.

Frates MC, Benson CB, Doubilet PM, Cibas ES and Marqusee E. Can color Doppler sonography aid in the prediction of malignancy of thyroid nodules? J Ultrasound Med 2003; 22:127–131.

Papini E, Guglielmi R, Bianchini A et al. Risk of malignancy in nonpalpable thyroid nodules: predictive value of ultrasound and color-Doppler features. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002; 87:1941–1946.

Stark DD, Clark OH and Moss AA. Magnetic resonance imaging of the thyroid, thymus, and parathyroid glands. Surgery. 1984; 96:1083-1091.

Katz JF, Kane RA, Reyes J, Clarke MP and Hill 8C. Thyroid nodules: sonographic-pathologic correlation. Radiology. 1984; 151:741-745.

Gerry HT and Hossein G. Thyroid incidentalomas: Management Approaches to non-palpable nodules discovered incidentally on thyroid imaging. Annals of Internal Medicine 1997; 126(3): 226-231.

Moon WJ, Jung SL, Lee JH et al. Benign and malignant thyroid nodules: US differentiation- multicenter retrospective study. Radiology 2008; 247(3): 762-770.